Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making it More Heideggerian - by Hubert L. Dreyfus, Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):247 – 268 (2007) - Part 2
Translation in Greek by Alkis Gounaris
Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making it More Heideggerian - by Hubert L. Dreyfus, Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):247 – 268 (2007) - Part 3
Translation in Greek by Alkis Gounaris
The ontological foundation of environmental ethics in Heidegger
Τhis paper summarizes the main points of Heideggerian ontology which is associated with human beings, nature, technology and the relationship between them, as well as their ethical implications.
Heideggerian Eco -Phenomenology: Dasein-centrism or Deep Ecology?
This paper describes the problem of considering the Heideggerian theory of Dasein and Being-in-the-world as a framework of modern environmental ideologies and movements.
Terrorism, Civil Disobedience and the Right of Resistance in Modern Democracies
Full text in Greek only.
Terrorism and Armed Violence: Conceptual Differences, Ethical Valuation and Observation of the phenomenon in Democracy, focusing on the Greek experience
This essay examines the problem of terrorism, particularly the phenomenon of terrorism in Western democracies. The objectives of this paper is to approach: (a) the concept of terrorism and the moral dimension of the problem, (b) the difference in the nature of armed violence in totalitarian and democratic regimes, (c) the moral impact of these operations, especially within the Greek experience.
Wittgenstein: Lecture On Ethics: The influence of Paul Ernst
Continuing the attempt to define the concept of absolute value in the Lecture on Ethics, this article explores the possibly influence of - the art and literature theorist - Paul Ernst, the writings of whom Wittgenstein was reading at the time.
Wittgenstein: Lecture On Ethics: The notion of Absolute Values and the naturalistic fallacy
This essay summarizes the main points of Wittgenstein’s lecture on ethics and examines whether and how the lecture reflects the Tractatus. It also investigates and analyzes the possible logical errors that has been accused for, especially the notion of judgments of absolute value. Finally, is presenting the argument between two modern Greek analysts of the text.
